Harry Potter is well known to be
the hero of his story, and the villains are also well known. Even those who have not read the books or
watched the movies know that Harry is the star, and Voldemort is the
villain. But, while reading the books
for myself, I often thought that Harry was a bit of a jerk. He, ultimately, makes the right decision
every time, but in some moments between his heroism, his attitude, for some
reason, makes me cringe. I cannot point
to specific times (except for the moment at the end of The Sorcerer’s Stone when he is thinking of the fun he will have
intimidating his cousin) when he behaves badly, but something about the way he
behaves in general throws me off. Don’t
get me wrong – he is still the hero and I rooted for him the entire way. But it seems to me that – in general – unless
the day needs saving, if he did not have his friends and mentors to keep him on
track, he could become a brat.
Why, I wonder? Later in the series, when Harry and I
discovered that part of Voldemort’s soul resides within Harry, I could not help
but reevaluate everything that Harry had ever done. Every action of his became suspect because he
might not have been performing the act entirely on his own. But it got me to thinking. What if all this is all credit to Harry’s
agency and heroism? When the situation
is rather inconsequential (when the trio is merely making their way around
Hogwarts after curfew, for example) no life or death situations need be
made. Therefore, Harry may not to have
complete control of himself and Voldemort may be gaining ground. But when something immensely important is
going down (such as the conflict with Voldemort over the Sorcerer’s Stone)
Harry asserts himself and makes the right decision. All of this would be unconscious on Harry’s
part, of course.
Even more notable – even though not
told in the first installment – is how Harry destroys the horcrux inside of
him. Every other horcrux the trio had
destroyed put up a fight. The locket
hurt Ron where it could best, and it also tried to choke Harry. The notebook produced the thoughts of Tom
Riddle to lead Harry and Ginny astray.
The snake obviously tried to kill its attackers. So, why did the horcrux inside of Harry not fight
back or do something when he was simply standing and waiting for Voldemort to
kill him? Why did it not overcome
Harry’s mind and fight back? I think that – though Harry was not aware of the
battle inside his mind, or rather, soul – this is instance of Harry’s
agency. He was able to push the part of
him that was Voldemort out of his consciousness and make a sacrifice.
What if, despite the fact that
Harry had no contribution to his circumstances – his parent’s death,
Voldemort’s curse, growing up with the Dursley’s – his heroism is actually him making decisions – unconscious
decisions that deny Voldemort’s authority within? And whenever he is behaving less than
heroically, such as after his first year at Hogwarts, it is him unaware that Voldemort resides in him? I think it gives a new thought to agency
within Harry Potter, in light of the
appearance of Harry having none, or little, in his life.
No comments:
Post a Comment